By David Truman and Greg Clancy

When Angela Merkel opened the German gates to mass immigration in 2015 she was confident that Wir schaffen das (we can do it).  What she probably had in mind was her nation’s ability to economically, politically and socially accommodate the new arrivals.

Nearly nine years later it is clear that she was wrong on all counts.  Worse, new developments quickly emerged as unanticipated problems of crime, terrorism and community division took their toll on the native population.

The crime wave accompanying the new arrivals also presented the German authorities with a problem – how to “manage” the reporting and statistical accumulation of crimes committed by “refugees” who were predominately Islamic.  The “we can do it” idea took on the new challenge and the government sought to cover up, as far as possible, the illegal activities to “protect” the public from – what we would call today – “misinformation”.

The Australian federal and state governments have, like so many European countries, adopted a similar methodology in dealing with Islamic crime, including terrorism.

Two recent experiences in Australia – the Sydney attack on the Assyrian bishop in April – he lost an eye – and the terrorist attack in Perth in early May, have confirmed the adopted tactic of what we can call “Official Islam” in dealing with the aftermath of an Islamic terrorist attack and briefing the public. 

Briefing the public:  separation and isolation!

The bottom line of the “briefing tactic” is separation and isolation.  Every effort is to be made to detach the terrorist from mainstream Islam.  Each rule is to include an element to isolate the offender from everyone else thus resulting in the removal of the motivation to enquire as to whether there may be something else involved.

What irony, at a time when the Albanese government is trying to bring in legislation to stop “misinformation and disinformation” !

The rules are as follows:

1/ When an Islamic terrorist attack occurs, never mention “Islam” or “Islamic”.

2/ If the offender is a teenager, allow the “young and stupid” implication to flow through the briefing – even if not actually stated.

3/ As soon as possible, introduce the claim of “radicalization”.  This has the immediate effect of isolating the offender from “normal” Islam thus avoiding the need to answer more searching questions.

4/ Add “on the internet” to explain how the radicalization occurred.  The idea that an unknown and mysterious force of evil – somewhere out in the ether – twisted the mind of a young and vulnerable individual simply reinforces the separation objective.  It removes responsibility from the local community into the dark world of the internet and the separation and isolation objective is now virtually achieved.

To cap off the briefing exercise, there is one more vital component:

5/ Mental illness.  This provides the coup de grace to the briefing and even offers some sympathy for the offender.  In fact, an effective mental illness presentation could potentially wipe out any liability for the terrorist attack and the offender may be transformed into a victim.

While mental illness is a serious matter – the Bondi attacker apparently did have a problem with some form of mental illness – this has unfortunately been used excessively to explain criminal events in Europe, particularly since 2015.  By blaming “mental illness”, authorities relieve themselves from the need to offer alternative suggestions which may result in “uncomfortable” situations such as looking at verses from the Koran and other Islamic texts that may influence adherents of the faith to murder infidels.   Refer back to the graphic at top of this article, where a prominent Australian imam incites violent jihad against all non-Muslims “for the sake of Allah” as the only solution.

In preaching this message, the imam is echoing Koran 61:9 which says that Islam must be “exalted above all religions,” and Koran 8:60, which says “strike terror into the enemy of God and your enemy, and others beside therm… All that you give in the cause of God shall be repaid to you.”

There’s a lot more.  Here are just a few verses from the “holy Koran,”, believed by Muslims to be the unchangeable and perfect words of Allah:

8:59 Let not the unbelievers think that they will ever get away… so that you may strike terror into the enemy of Allah, and your enemy and others beside them who are unknown to you but known to Allah.

34:51  If you could only see the unbelievers when they are seized with terror.

2:216  Fighting is obligatory for you, much as you dislike it. 2:244  Fight for the cause of Allah.

8:39  Make war on them until idolatry shall cease and Allah’s religion shall reign supreme.

9:5  When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.

9:39  If you do not go to war, He will punish you severely, and replace you by other men.

9:123  Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal harshly with them.

Dr Mark Durie, an eminent Christian minister and world expert on Islam, writing about this and the deeply hateful anti-Semitism that is integral to Islamic doctrine, writes: 

“Australian “infidels” (non-Muslims) seem strangely unwilling to do anything about a pattern of religious incitement targeting them which has been around for decades. 

Why are our heads so firmly planted in the sand?  Are we really willing to stand by and let “our whole style of democracy”, our very way of life, be profoundly changed by religious incitement?  If we are not, then something needs to change – something that goes to the very root of how we understand Islam and the role it plays in our society.”

Meanwhile, the mainstream media, cocooned in their “Official Islam” delusion, walk away from the real issue and the politicians in power mumble a few words (“there is no place in Australia blah blah) and say that no further action is required.  The offender has been neatly presented as a manipulated unfortunate individual and will now undergo a useless “deradicalization” program.  Yes, useless.  There is almost zero evidence of successful deradicalization in countries like Australia.

“Official Islam”

The TRUE nature of Islam is revealed in its sacred texts and its history.  There is another, counterfeit Islam that was given voice by George Bush, Obama and the media.   Bush laid down a basic version of “Official Islam” in the National Cathedral soon after 9/11.  Obama added many details in his Cairo speech, June 4, 2009.  But Official Islam was not invented by the media, Bush or Obama, but by the Muslim Brotherhood. 

This doctrine became the standard in all of the universities when the Brotherhood, powered by Saudi money, invaded and took over the Middle East departments.  That is the reason that the media went along with the official version – and so did most of our politicians, police departments and even national security organs, so keen were they to believe that our society could live with this ideology in peace as a demonstration of multiculturalist diversity and inclusion.

Very many preachers, rabbis and politicians believe in this Official Islam, at least in public – despite all the evidence staring them in the face.  In the West, the population generally does not believe the official narrative, but the elites think they know better, have no love for their own native-born people, and have contempt for “populist” reactions to daily terrorist outrages.

Here are the major points of Official Islam:
  • Islam is a religion similar to Christianity and Judaism.  They all worship the same god and are of the Abrahamic faith.
  • Good Muslims prove that Islam is good
  • There are no jihadists, just extremists fuelled by poverty
  • “Extremists” cause the violence
  • The “bad stuff” in the Koran is due to how it is interpreted
  • Islam must be accommodated in as many ways as possible
  • One of the proofs of Islam’s greatness is the Islamic Golden Age, thought by some to be humanity’s best days
  • Violence is perpetrated by Muslims because they are poor and abused
  • The West received the foundation of its intellectual world from Islam
  • The Crusades were a great evil committed by Christians
  • There are mostly moderate Muslims and only a few extremist Muslims 
  • Islam is only found in the Koran
  • Good Muslims will reform the “extremists”
  • Islam is the religion of tolerance
  • Islam has a Golden Rule
  • Islam is a wonderful part of American (and Australian, German, French, British etc) culture
  • Islam is the religion of freedom and justice.

But the official version of Islam is a BIG LIE.  Official Islam does not agree with the Islamic scriptures – Koran, Sira and Hadith – since it is not based upon them.  It is based upon the propaganda of our establishment media, government and schools. 

NOT ONE LINE OF THE OFFICIAL ISLAM IS TOTALLY TRUE AND MANY OF THE POINTS ARE COMPLETE FABRICATIONS. At best, some assertions are partially true.  A half-truth is a lie.  People who push “Official Islam” are Islamically illiterate.

Naturally, the impact of Islamic law, the fundamental principles of Islam and the heaven-sent instructions to all Muslims will not receive a mention – that would be Islamophobic.  With the Gaza war in full swing and western universities brimming with “useful idiots” and hateful professors, now is not the time for weak governments, such as ours, to look beyond the period until the next election.

Islamic terrorism is mandated by the Islamic scriptures

Generally speaking, when Muslims are a small minority in a country, they protect themselves by affecting to be “moderate” and peaceful.  Like the Perth imam who commented on the very recent event in Perth, they shovel out misleading rubbish that Islam means “peace.”  It does NOT!  It means SUBMISSION.  Islam is about submission to the will of Allah.  Islam divides the whole world into two:  the World of Islam (Dar al Islam) and the World of War (Dar al Harb).  Peace is defined as a state which obtains only when the whole world has submitted to Islam.

Until that state is reached, Muslims are mandated by their scriptures to fight JIHAD – war to establish the religion.  That is exactly what Imam Abdul Salam Zoud told his flock in Lakemba on 24 February, and is endlessly repeated in mosque after mosque.

Local “moderate” imams who speak for Islam in Australia know this full well, but are discomfited only when “radicalized” hotheads jump the gun before Muslims are numerically strong enough to have a chance of prevailing.   As indeed they are now doing in a distressing number of European countries.

This is how Christmas is celebrated in parts of France – a country which now has well overt seven hundred “Sensitive Zones”, no-go zones where ordinary citizens and the police dare not enter.  What a disgrace!

Meanwhile, Useful Idiots who swallow this nonsense and think of themselves as “tolerant and inclusive” do our Western countries a massive disservice when they encourage swamping our peaceful societies with refugees, overwhelmingly Muslim.

And some of the worst offenders are “progressive” churches.  In August 2015, the Elanora (Gold Coast) Uniting Church had the stupidity to support approval for the proposed Currumbin Waters Mosque.  A local broadcaster, a Christian, penned these words of protest to the Elanora Uniting Church:
“While the Bible teaches charity and forgiveness and love it does not teach we should support and promote false religions, and indeed opposes the worship of idols and the like. … To foster or sanction the Muslim religion by aiding their establishment is working directly against the teachings of the gospel.”

Official Islam is a mind-set of denial and delusion and is an important component of the intellectual basis of the destruction of our civilization. 


Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *